I’ve been receiving both sides of the story of either tibetans want independent or not. I have no idea which to believe because I’m not very well-read about this situation. Please only provide rational and helpful answers. Thanks.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20071222194345AAiVMFt&show=7
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AlUTpNMCncjME6YgCGXYJjEjzKIX;_ylv=3?qid=20070807014048AArLAp3
I thought these are questions with a rational answer.
I know there are a lot of people screaming ‘free tibet’
But as the 1st link’s best answer (helloworld) pointed out if tibet are really freed, who will be their government? The monks? do you realise how many people will die of starvation?
The second link look at Chaos and yadda!’s answer:
"Many experts said if China did not invade Tibet, Tibet will not be improved like today. Although Beijing rule that region with heavy hand, still Tibet enjoyed modernization and economy plan by Beijing…" (more from second link)
Tibet experienced unprecedented development of the productive forces and improvements in living standards.
Many Tibetan farmers, for example, have no interest in surrendering the land they gained during China’s land reform to the clans. Tibet’s former slaves say they, too, don’t want their former masters to return to power. “I’ve already lived that life once before,” said Wangchuk, a 67-year-old former slave who was wearing his best clothes for his yearly pilgrimage to Shigatse, one of the holiest sites of Tibetan Buddhism. He said he worshipped the Dalai Lama, but added, “I may not be free under Chinese communism, but I am better off than when I was a slave" — Michael Parenti, The Culture Struggle (Seven Stories, 2006).
Kim Lewis, who studied healing methods with a Buddhist monk in Berkeley, California, had occasion to talk at length with more than a dozen Tibetan women who lived in the monk’s building. When she asked how they felt about returning to their homeland, the sentiment was unanimously negative. At first, Lewis assumed that their reluctance had to do with the Chinese occupation, but they quickly informed her otherwise. They said they were extremely grateful “not to have to marry 4 or 5 men, be pregnant almost all the time,” or deal with sexually transmitted diseases contacted from a straying husband. The younger women “were delighted to be getting an education, wanted absolutely nothing to do with any religion, and wondered why Americans were so naïve [about Tibet].” — Kim Lewis, correspondence to me, 15 July 2004.
If had not the Chinese going into tibet, they are still a country with slavery. Tibetan peasant slave system once exist under Dalai Lama’s regime. But, it was abolished in 1949.
http://www.swans.com/library/art9/mparen01.html
Tibet’s GDP in 2001 was 13.9 billion yuan (USD1.8billion). The Central government exempts Tibet from all taxation and provides 90% of Tibet’s government expenditures. The Tibetan economy is dominated by subsistence agriculture. In recent years, due to the increased interest in Tibetan Buddhism, tourism has become an increasingly important sector, and is actively promoted by the authorities. The Tibetan economy is heavily subsidized by the Central government and government cadres receive the second-highest salaries in China.
Tourism brings in the most income from the sale of handicrafts. These include Tibetan hats, jewelry (silver and gold), wooden items, clothing, quilts, fabrics, Tibetan rugs and carpets. — wikipedia.
Also, Qinghai-Tibet Railway was also built by the chinese government to bring in tourism.
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/english/doc/2004-05/23/content_333024.htm
Yes, i watched Youtube, i also watched from other sources (I’m Singaporean btw). what you see in youtube and tv might really be just 0.01% of truth. and ALL countries news carry biasness. What i suggest is that go to tibet and ask them yourself and all your questions will be cleared. I had friends going there, they say it’s a really beautiful place. I should be visiting around may this year, maybe then I’ll give you a more certain answer.
EDIT: And PLS, by just looking at 0.1% of truth does not make them an expert.
and i need to say something, the one behind me said who don’t want freedom. But freedom comes with a price. US, a country with plenty of freedom, but look at the crime rates. It’s one of the highest in the whole world, and not to mention gun carrying people who shot their schoolmate, teachers. When I went to US for exchange studies many years back, people (esp girls) there tell me they don’t even dare to stay out too late in the night. But in my country, although the laws are rigid(my country even banned chewing gum), it is very safe and clean. And everyone is happy. Is this not what everyone wants? to be happy and feel the security that no matter how late your daughter is, you will not worry for her safety? Same with China (only big cities, never really go to outskirt yet.), I can be walking at 2am in a lonely road and never feel afriad. (China have more petite crime such as pickpockets tho). Yes, freedom is good, who does not want more of it. But freedom comes with a price, and that may just be my daughter getting shot in a shoot out. Sorry if my words came out too strong, I’m just so irritated with people screaming freedom when they don’t even know it’s actually a great responsibility.
I am more on side of tibet being part of china. For 2 simple reason. economy and standard of living. (and there is also a possiblity that the slave system will be re-enforced if they were to be independent.)
Anyway, It’s pointless to keep screaming ‘free tibet’ because it is impossible.
By the way, I think you are a smart person who don’t blindly see things from one side. Thank you for asking! and hoped i helped!